Published on October 26 2017

Doug Casey: How I Learned to Love Bitcoin

Justin’s note: Cryptocurrencies have been on a tear.

Bitcoin is up 495% this year. Ethereum, another major cryptocurrency, is up 3,507% since the start of the year. Smaller cryptos have soared more than 10,000%.

When you see gains like that, it’s natural to think that you missed out. I even felt this way for the longest time…that is, until I talked to Doug Casey.

You see, a few weeks ago, I called Doug to see what he thinks about cryptos. He told me why Bitcoin is money. He told me why the crypto market’s about to get a lot bigger. He even told me why Bitcoin could soon hit $50,000… That’s eight times higher than where it trades today.

After that conversation, I became convinced that cryptos are the real deal. I even just bought some Bitcoin myself.

Of course, I realize that not everyone’s got a legendary speculator on speed dial. So over the next two days, I’m sharing a brand-new essay from Doug. In it, he explains why the crypto boom has a long way to go.


By Doug Casey, founder, Casey Research

In this article, I’d like to explain how I learned to love Bitcoin. Why it’s a wonderful thing. Its potential as a speculation. How the government is going to co-opt it. And how this is all likely to end.

I was first introduced to Bitcoin several years ago in Cafayate, Argentina. A young Belgian guy came to visit, I bought him lunch, and we discussed Bitcoin. He was a very early enthusiast. He gave me a physical Bitcoin as a souvenir. They’re now collectibles, but the digital codes are inscribed on them. I still have that Bitcoin. It was worth $13 at the time.

I wish I had listened to his argument more carefully, because I could have made millions. Over 300-1 over just a few years… that’s rare indeed. I was inclined towards it philosophically, but outsmarted myself on an investment level. Because Bitcoin was pitched to me as an alternative currency, and I failed to see all of its advantages in that role.

My original objection was that Bitcoin isn’t backed by anything. It’s really a private fiat currency. It’s very much like the Zambian Kwacha, the Argentine peso, the US dollar, or any of the other 150-plus currencies in today’s world. It’s a floating abstraction. Unlike state currencies, though, its acceptance isn’t enforced by laws. But, on the other hand, its quantity is limited. But would that be enough to get large amounts of people to use it as a currency?

I missed something when I said, back then, that it had no value. It’s a fiat currency, yes, but it has much more practical value than any other.

Recommended Link

Announcing: Teeka Tiwari’s Free Cryptocurrency Training Week
Teeka Tiwari’s cryptocurrency picks have given his readers the chance to make as much as 1,241%, 2,050% and even 14,354% in as little as six months. This week only, he’s sharing his groundbreaking strategy… revealing the name of the "next big thing in cryptocurrencies"… and giving you a chance to claim some of the Bitcoin that we’re giving away. Details here.

A currency has to be a good medium of exchange, and a store of value. Even a few years ago, both of those things were wild speculations when it came to Bitcoin. I tried to analyze the situation rationally, using Aristotle’s five characteristics of a good money.

Aristotle defined the five characteristics of good money in the 4th century BC. And his analysis is as accurate now as it was then. It must be durable, divisible, convenient, consistent, and have use value in and of itself. Based on that, Aristotle believed gold and silver were best suited for use as money. Let’s analyze how Bitcoin does by these five criteria.

Durable. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are definitely durable—unless we have a major electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or a significant solar flare that wipes out all the computers. Bitcoins are not as durable as the metals, but they’re adequate, barring a collapse of civilization.

Divisible. Bitcoin is infinitely divisible. Better than the physical metals, actually—although the metals can be accounted in tiny fractions too.

Convenient. Yes—as long as you have a smartphone, Bitcoin is very convenient. But your smartphone, or something like it, may not always be with you. And your counterparty also has to have one. And it’s not very convenient if someone doesn’t know or trust Bitcoin. Right now, that’s still probably 98% of humanity.

Consistent. Absolutely. Every Bitcoin is exactly like another one. It’s at least as good as .999 fine gold that way.

The problem I had with Bitcoin was the fifth point: Does it have use value in itself, so you can’t get stuck holding the bag?

If you have a million US paper dollars, and nobody accepts them, they have no use in and of themselves—except as wall decorations or kindling. They’re just unsecured liabilities of a bankrupt government. In essence like a million Zimbabwe dollars, although there’s obviously a continuum. Fiat currencies can be easily destroyed by their issuers. The things are burning matches. They have half-lives, like radioactive elements.

Sure, there were advantages to Bitcoin being a privately issued fiat currency. But I didn’t see its real use value; that’s where I went wrong.

Bitcoin is certainly a fiat currency like the dollar or the Kwacha. But it’s also an excellent transfer device. You can move wealth from one country to another, or to another person, quickly and privately. I’d say secretly, but you’re not supposed to say “secret” anymore, you can only say “private.” Part of the politically correct corruption of language, I might add.

And you can do so outside of the banking system, which is increasingly important. If you use Bitcoin, you don’t need a bank to store your money.

Recommended Link

FREE Training Video: How to invest in any cryptocurrency

For the first time, cryptocurrency expert Teeka Tiwari is releasing a free "over the shoulder" training video on how to invest in any cryptocurrency. You’ll have everything you need to invest in all the hottest cryptos. Details here.

Cryptocurrencies, like Bitcoins, are just the first, and most obvious, application of blockchain technology. Hopefully, among other things, blockchain and Bitcoin are going to destroy the SWIFT system, the vehicle for wiring money from one bank to another. SWIFT is expensive (at least $50-100 per transaction), slow (generally a day or two, sometimes a week or more), and insecure (who trusts either big banks or the US Government?). And SWIFT requires that all dollars clear through New York; non-Americans don’t care for that. SWIFT is used by thousands of banks around the world to send payment instructions worth trillions of dollars each day. Incidentally, it's not that I'm against SWIFT itself. It's just that it's become a creature of the banks—who abuse it and are actually responsible for its problems.

So, this is one big use value of Bitcoin. It allows you to transfer something that is accepted as money outside of the banking system, and outside of government fiat currencies.

Bitcoin is well on the way to being accepted as money. I think it will succeed.

What is money? Money is a medium of exchange and a store of value. Almost anything can be used as money. Some things are just much better than others.

Salt, seashells, and cows have all historically been used as money. After all, the word pecuniary comes from the Latin pecus, which means cow. And salary comes from the Latin sal, which is salt. Wampum were seashells. Cigarettes are money in prisons and war zones. Even giant Yap island discs have been used as money.

Bitcoin is becoming more and more accepted as a medium of exchange, while most government fiat currencies approach their intrinsic values—essentially zero.

Bitcoin is a bit more problematic as a store of value. Once again, let’s get back to the basics. You’ve got two kinds of currencies: commodity currencies and fiat currencies.

The commodity currencies are actual physical commodities. You know they have use value. Fiat currencies, on the other hand, are just made up. They’re totally arbitrary and political.

It’s like that old joke about sardines. You’ve got eating sardines and trading sardines. Commodity currencies are eating sardines. Fiat currencies are trading sardines. Of course, there’s no guarantee that Bitcoin is going to be accepted a year or two from now. It’s a high tech innovation, and maybe a Version 2.0 will collapse the value of the current version. So in a few years, we may find that Bitcoin fails the store of value test. But it’s accepted at the moment. And it’s been growing in value at a crazy rate—unlike fiat currencies, which have all been falling against real goods and services at about 5-10% a year. Incidentally, I don’t put much faith in the accuracy of government inflation figures.

Bitcoin has been a great speculation so far. But as a store of value? Bitcoin is a technological innovation. There likely will be Bitcoin 2.0 and 3.0, not to mention other, even more advanced cryptos. What will the current Bitcoin then be worth? There’s a reason the expression “High tech, big wreck” is true. Just because so far it’s been a great speculation, doesn’t mean it’s a good store of value. Technology, a solar flare, or even government action could wipe it out.

The bottom line? Bitcoin passes the medium of exchange test for the moment and store of value test for the moment. So you can definitely say it’s money—for the moment. But so does the Argentine peso, for the moment. I have little confidence, however, Bitcoin will be here, say, five years from now. Buying cryptos is not like socking away gold coins.

The $64 question is: Where are we in the market cycle for cryptos? Clearly, we’re no longer early in the game. It’s like getting into the Internet stocks back in 1998—they weren’t cheap, but the bubble got much, much bigger. And the Internet—contrary to what people like Paul Krugman thought—was not itself a bubble. Up till now, the only way to play this has been the coins, the tokens, like Bitcoin. There are perhaps a thousand of them out there now, and most of them are garbage.

Because I think the bubble will get much bigger, I’m getting involved in these cryptocurrencies on several levels. Including public mining companies, which is not germane to this article. I’m trying to make the trend my friend. But cautiously, because there’s a lot of speculation going on.

I am concerned about the market, which is very bubbly. But I think it’s going much higher, for several reasons. One, as we discussed, is that some of the cryptos have great utility, and only about 25 million out of the 7 billion people in the world currently own them. I promise you that five years from now that number will be more like three billion. They’re going to get much bigger in the developed world, but even bigger in the Third World.

Regards,

Doug Casey
Founder, Casey Research

Justin’s note: On November 2, our colleague Teeka Tiwari will be hosting an exclusive cryptocurrency investment briefing. Teeka, if you don’t already know, is one of the world’s top cryptocurrency analysts. Since April 2016, Teeka’s told his readers about 26 crypto opportunities. The average gain of those recommendations is 1,021%.

I urge you to join me in this free event where you’ll learn everything you need to know about getting started with cryptocurrencies. You’ll get the name of one of Teeka’s favorite recommendations. And not only that, but Teeka will be giving away $1 million worth of bitcoin during this event. You don’t want to miss this. Click here to reserve your spot today.


Reader Mailbag

Today, a reader responds to our mailbag from October 24:

Kosta, your heart seems to be in the right place but I think you need to review the history of drug and alcohol abuse. Until they were outlawed they were NOT widely abused.

Millions of Americans suffer from severe chronic pain (including this writer). Many are addicted to morphine or other drugs. No, I am not one of them because these drugs don't work for me. What does work is CBD [cannabidiol] which comes from both hemp and marijuana. Now that pot is legal in my state (NV) I can go down to the local pot shop and buy the CBD oil that allows me to get some sleep at night.

We need to eliminate the laws nationally so those suffering can find some relief. If the government gets some tax benefit, that is great too. Better them than the drug companies.

—Florence

And more feedback on Doug’s recent interview on the NFL protests

I haven’t seen a comments section for your communiqués before. A new feature? Anyway, I’m surprised there are so many dopey people reading what Doug has to say. Seems as if they would have self-selected out of the distribution list by now. And how they ever got on it in the first place is a mystery to me? To you too, I would imagine.

—Tom

Wow! Just read the responses to Doug's NFL interview. Doug proved his point on how many people are indoctrinated sheep and chimpanzees, I think they missed his point of view entirely, and yes I watch NFL games and prefer college over NFL. College is a much more diverse, respectful crowd of students, parents, alumni, marching band, all types of local members of the business community.

—Anonymous

As a subscriber, I have enjoyed Doug’s comments almost always. I truly appreciate his non-conformist, politically incorrect views. They are like a whiff of fresh air. No one else I know does this with such remarkable and intelligent consistency.

I am German. Doug takes two references to the dark ages of the German past. And he is of course right about those points.

But I also always admired the US/Americans for their patriotism, which for obvious reasons, we don’t have in Germany any longer. Playing the national anthem at sporting events has a nice touch. It shows people are indeed living in individual nations and not so much in faceless, globalized super nanny states. Yet.

Looking at European soccer/football teams, they look like an assembly of nationless mercenaries. They could play for anyone and any nation, whoever pays the most. People in Europe are seriously considering not to have national teams any longer. So, what would it be then? Would people still cheer such teams? Sometimes I think, we should not take the dissolution of local entities too far. We need units to identify with. In Germany, we are supposed to be proud of our constitution, not our country. I think that is a step into losing interest in what is happening around us on a larger scale.

So, Doug and staff, be happy with the appreciation of your nation that has contributed so much to the world. When that appreciation is gone, it is all random and no one cares any longer. With all the liberalism we appreciate, I don’t think that is what we want. Anyhow, Doug’s comments inspire thought and controversy. And that is great. Keep up that inspiring work!

—Anonymous