By Andrey Dashkov, analyst, Casey Research
After falling below $1,500 an ounce in March, gold peaked at over $2,050 in August.
But since then, it’s been trading sideways.
It’s now back to trading around $1,860, about 9% below its peak.
Some investors may be asking, “Is the rally over?”
The Gold Bull Is Poised To Continue
All of the factors that drove gold above $2,000 per ounce are still in full swing…
The economic fallout of COVID and the government stimulus… the historically low real interest rates… rampant money-printing… all of these factors are still at play.
So no, the gold rally isn’t over. It’s poised to continue…
But I won’t dwell on that, for now.
I’ll leave you with this example, though. Back in 2009–2011 – before gold set a historic price record – it corrected by 7% or more at least five times over three years.
As Casey Report chief analyst Nick Giambruno often says, “nothing goes up in a straight line.”
Up until gold’s peak in 2011, it kept correcting. And often, it’s healthy to relieve that buying pressure.
But when a pullback like the one we’re seeing now happens, it’s a good idea to reflect.
More specifically, in times like these, it pays to add extra protection to your portfolio. And make sure that when it comes to gold, you’re not only exposed to the upside… but also have downside protection.
Where To Turn for Safety in Gold
If you’ve been following along with me here, you know I’m a big fan of gold miners. They offer upside leverage to the price of gold. And when gold moves an inch, gold miners can move a mile.
Here’s an example of what I mean.
Say it costs a mining company $1,700 per ounce to mine the gold.
At a gold price of $1,800, the company has a potential profit of $100 on each ounce of gold.
However, if the price of gold rises only 6% to $1,900, the company’s profits per ounce increase by 100% ($1,900 – $1,700 = $200 profit per ounce). That could push the company’s stock higher by 40%, 50%, or more – all because of a small move in gold itself.
That’s why we like gold miners. They offer explosive upside when gold prices go up.
But leverage goes both ways…
For example, if the price of gold declines from $1,800 to $1,700, which is also just a 6% move, that same gold miner stops making money.
So you need to find companies whose costs are low enough to stay profitable… even if the price of gold corrects like it is today.
At a mining cost of, say, $1,200 per ounce, a miner’s net income would decline 17% if the price of gold goes from $1,800 to $1,700.
But it will continue making money.
Which will protect its share price and, if it pays dividends, allow it to continue to do so.
Of course, this example is simplified. The main point here is that some companies are better protected from gold price fluctuations than others.
And there’s one metric that’s the best when it comes to understanding a mining company’s ability to weather a storm…
Our Best Tool for Gauging Mining Companies
That metric is the all-in sustaining cost, often shortened to AISC. It helps us gauge a mining company’s total costs, and its ability to weather fluctuations in the price of what it is mining… in this case, gold.
AISC includes direct costs, sustaining capital, exploration costs, and others.
Let’s say you’re comparing two gold mining companies, one with an AISC of $1,100 an ounce, and the other with an AISC of $1,500 an ounce.
Generally speaking, the company with the lower AISC of $1,100 is a safer bet.
That’s because it offers greater upside if the price of gold rises… but won’t lose its shirt if gold declines. It will make less money, of course, but its bottom line will likely remain positive.
So gold miners with lower AISCs are usually better protected against movements in the gold price.
With this in mind, take a look at the table below.
It shows the five lowest-AISC gold miners with market capitalizations of $1 billion or more, based on their 2019 AISCs.
|Company Name||Symbol||2019 AISC, USD/ounce|
|Kirkland Lake Gold||KL||$564|
|Dundee Precious Metals||DPMLF||$725|
Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence
The miner with the highest AISC, Dundee’s $725 per ounce, is 61% below the current gold price. That means even if gold went below $1,000 – which I don’t think is likely – the company still wouldn’t lose any money mining the gold.
Costs can make or break a mining company. So you should look at them carefully.
And keep in mind, these companies should be used as a starting point for your own research.
You should always do your due diligence when investing in any stock, especially smaller, riskier ones (we call them speculations).
My colleague, chief analyst Nick Giambruno, also has a basket of gold mining companies in his Casey Report advisory (and some good information on why holding gold and gold stocks is essential).
However, if you would prefer a one-click way to invest in a diversified portfolio of gold miners, take a look at the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). It holds three of the lowest-AISC companies in the table above, and more.
Analyst, Casey Research